4th July 2006
COMPASSION IN WORLD
FARMING - IRELAND
SUBMISSION TO
DISCUSSIONS ON THE FORMULATION OF AN ACTION PLAN FOR THE PIG INDUSTRY IN
Introduction.
Compassion in World Farming (
1. Pigs should be provided with a sufficient
quantity of suitable manipulable material.
Commission Directive
2001/93/EC (amending Directive 91/630 EEC laying down minimum standards for the
protection of pigs) introduced an important reform for pig welfare. Paragraph 4 of the Annex provides that, from
1 January 2003, “pigs must have permanent
access to a sufficient quantity of material to enable proper investigation and
manipulation activities, such as straw, hay, wood, sawdust, mushroom compost,
peat or a mixture of such…”.
The Food and Veterinary Office (FVO) has recently produced a
series of reports on investigations carried out in various Member States (FVO
reports of missions carried out in 2005 in
The FVO reports found that some farmers in the countries they looked at were ignoring the legislation altogether, whilst others were trying to evade it by using unsuitable materials - such as chains - that fail to enable “proper investigation and manipulation activities” as required by the Directive.
The Directive requires the use of materials that enable “proper” investigation and manipulation activities. The scientific literature shows that chains are ineffective enrichment materials. A recent study of expert opinion published in the journal Animal Welfare
(Bracke M. B. M., Animal Welfare 2006, 15: 67-70) reports that 89% of pig welfare scientists who responded to a questionnaire stated that providing a chain is not sufficient; only 3% think a chain is sufficient. The experts identified the ability to enable pigs to root, manipulate and chew and to provide sustained animal-material interactions as the main properties required for enrichment materials for pigs. Chains and similar inorganic materials do not fulfil these requirements.
The recent opinion by the EFSA Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare stresses the importance of environmental enrichment for pigs concluding that “if manipulable material is not provided, poor welfare is caused in pigs”. The opinion states that straw is the preferred material for pigs. Indeed, the scientific literature identifies straw as one of the best enrichment materials for pigs. Farmers with fully slatted floors are reluctant to use straw, but the EFSA opinion states that small quantities of straw can be used as environmental enrichment on slatted floors.
In light of this research and expert opinion, it is
2. Tail-docking of piglets should not be carried
out routinely.
It is also clear from the FVO reports that many farmers in the EU Member States they investigated are ignoring paragraph 8 of the Annex of Directive 2001/93/EC, which prohibits routine tail docking and stipulates that this procedure may only be carried out once other measures to prevent tail biting, such as improving the pigs’ conditions, have been taken.
Again, whilst these investigations did not include
There is a considerable body of scientific research and practical experience that show how tail biting can be prevented. The EFSA opinion stresses that “the occurrence of tail biting can be reduced dramatically by the provision of straw as well as by other measures”.
3. In the medium term, the industry should move
away from the use of farrowing crates.
4. Legal cut-off points regarding the use of sow
tethering and sow stalls should be strictly adhered to.
Sow tethering became illegal in all Member States from 1st
January 2006.
The use of sow stalls after the first 4 weeks of pregnancy will become illegal in all Member States from 1st January 2013. The industry should ensure that this requirement is fully complied with from that date.
Conclusion.
Mary-Anne Bartlett
Director
Compassion in World Farming -
Compassion in World
Farming -
Togher
Tel: 021 4639038